Since the passage of Prop 8 in California, there's been a lot of talk about a boycott of those organizations and businesses that contributed money and helped pass Prop 8, many of which are travel-related. Boycotts to further a political or moral purpose are nothing new, of course. Anita Bryant, spokesperson for Florida orange juice and the Florida Citrus Commission in the 1970s, was the target of perhaps the first product-based boycott for her anti-gay efforts that led to the repeal of gay-rights legislation in Dade County. The boycott was a public relations nightmare for Florida orange juice and it ended Bryant's career.
Recently, the popular blogger John Ardvosis, http://www.americablog.com/2008/11/why-is-sundance-film-festival-taking.html, called for a boycott of the Sundance Film Festival because of its Utah location. Brent Andrus, president of the Huntington Group of Hotels, was a major donor and supporter of Prop 8. He owns several Marriott properties in Southern California and there is apparently some question about whether he is a part owner of the Park City Marriott, which is the headquarters of the Sundance Film Festival.
Clearly, it makes sense as a gay/lesbian person (or supporter) to boycott businesses that helped pass Prop 8. You can check the data base at: http://www.sfgate.com/webdb/prop8/?appSession=88151446617129.
While boycotting the entire State of Utah because a majority of residents are Morman doesn't seem to make much sense to me, I do think targeted boycotting can have an impact. Gay Ski Week, for example, is in Park City each year. Shouldn't it be moved outside Utah? Isn't it logical to assume that many of the businesses profiting from the gay tourist dollars are no doubt associated with the Morman Church? And even if they're not, a boycott can put pressure on local residents to push for change at the state level.
Sundance supports have argued they are a venue for freedom of expression and a boycott would hurt those people most supportive of gay rights in Utah. Maybe. But the real value of a boycott is more often its public relations effect rather than the economic impact. As with Gay Ski Week, because the Morman Church is so dominant in Utah and Park City, and because they have an ownership interest in many businesses, won't we be indirectly supporting the Morman Church and its anti-gay policies by supporting the Sundance Film Festival? At the very minimum, more needs to be done by the Festival to separate itself from businesses it has a relationship with that supported Prop 8.
Earlier this year the controversial mayor of Ft. Lauderdale, Naugle, made a series of outrageous anti-gay statements. It generated national media attention and several organzations threatened to pull their convention business. Local residents raised the same arguments that Sundance and Gay Ski Week have raised. Naugle was voted off the Broward County Tourism Board and now two openly gay candidates and one gay-supportive candidate are running for mayor to replace the term-limited Naugle. Maybe something similar can happen in Utah.
A boycott should go beyond the Morman Church. More work needs to be done to identify those who helped pass Prop 8 and similar measures in Arizona and Florida. But Utah's 6 billion tourism industry seems like a good place to start. A gay boycott won't have much of an economic impact, but maybe its time to be more vocal and selective about where we spend our tourist dollars.